
Critical Views of LCSH, 1990–2001: The Third Bibliographic Essay, by Karen S. Fischer.
Abstract: This classified critical bibliography continues the work initiated by Monika Kirtland and Pauline Cochrane, and furthered by Steven Blake Shubert. Kirtland and Cochrane published a bibliography surveying the literature critical of LCSH from 1944-1979 titled “Critical Views of LCSH–Library of Congress Subject Headings, A Bibliographic and Bibliometric Essay.” Shubert analyzed another decade of literature in his article titled “Critical Views of LCSH–Ten Years Later: A Bibliographic Essay.” This current bibliography compiles the next twelve years of critical literature from 1990-2001. Persistent concerns of the past fifty-seven years include inadequate syndetic structure, currency or bias of the headings, and lack of specificity in the subject heading list. New developments and research are in the areas of subdivisions, mapping, indexer inconsistency, and post-coordination. LCSH must become more flexible and easier to use in order to increase its scalability and interoperability as an online subject searching tool.
Fischer, Karen S. Critical Views of LCSH, 1990–2001: The Third Bibliographic Essay, Cataloging & Classification Quarterly 41, no. 1 (2005):63-109.
Records, Responsibility, and Power: An Overview of Cataloging Ethics, by .
Abstract: Ethics are principles which provide a framework for making decisions that best reflect a set of values. Cataloging carries power, so ethical decision-making is crucial. Because cataloging requires decision-making in areas that differ from other library work, cataloging ethics are a distinct subset of library ethics. Cataloging ethics draw on the primary values of serving the needs of users and providing access to materials. Cataloging ethics are not new, but they have received increased attention since the 1970s. Major current issues in cataloging ethics include the creation of a code of ethics; ongoing debate on the appropriate role of neutrality in cataloging misleading materials and in subject heading lists and classification schemes; how and to what degree considerations of privacy and self-determination should shape authority work; and whether or not our current cataloging codes are sufficiently user-focused.
Jennifer M. Martin. Records, Responsibility, and Power: An Overview of Cataloging Ethics, Cataloging & Classification Quarterly 59, no. 2-3 (2021): 281-304.
. Cataloging Principles and Objectives: History and Development, by Shawne D. Miksa.
Abstract: Cataloging principles and objectives guide the formation of cataloging rules governing the organization of information within the library catalog, as well as the function of the catalog itself. Changes in technologies wrought by the internet and the web have been the driving forces behind shifting cataloging practice and reconfigurations of cataloging rules. Modern cataloging principles and objectives started in 1841 with the creation of Panizzi’s 91 Rules for the British Museum and gained momentum with Charles Cutter’s Rules for Descriptive Cataloging (1904). The first Statement of International Cataloguing Principles (ICP) was adopted in 1961, holding their place through such codifications as AACR and AACR2 in the 1970s and 1980s. Revisions accelerated starting in 2003 with the three original FR models. The Library Reference Model (LRM) in 2017 acted as a catalyst for the evolution of principles and objectives culminating in the creation of Resource Description and Access (RDA) in 2013.
. Cataloging Principles and Objectives: History and Development. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly 59, no. 2 (2021): 97-128.
Defining, Assessing, and Rethinking Quality Cataloging, Karen Snow
Abstract: Definitions of “quality cataloging” may differ from cataloger to cataloger and from institution to institution. If an objective definition of quality is elusive, how can an institution assess the quality of cataloging work? This article discusses definitions of quality cataloging in the literature and different ways it has been evaluated and measured. Academic library catalogers' perceptions of quality cataloging will also be explored, as well as how these perceptions are formed. The article concludes by suggesting ways cataloging departments can approach the creation and evaluation of quality cataloging in an ethical manner.
, Karen. Defining, Assessing, and Rethinking Quality Cataloging, Cataloging & Classification Quarterly 55, no. 7-8 (2017): 438-455.
A selection of libguides/guides that are related to what Critical Cataloging is and its applications. This includes discussing the Dewey Decimal System, the Library of Congress Classification System, subject headings and more.